Gorgis S, Dabbagh MF, Mishra K, Ahluwalia G, Hana A, Fram G, Dhillon D, Lemor A, Khan A, Miller D, Kaatz S, O'Neill WW, and Wang DD. Unprotected discharge: absence of stroke prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for bleeding. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2020.
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology
PURPOSE: Patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) on anticoagulation (AC) for stroke prevention are at an increased risk of bleeding. A common clinical dilemma is deciding when to safely restart AC following a bleed. Although studies have shown better outcomes with re-initiation of AC after hemostasis, there are clinical barriers to restarting AC. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a safe and efficacious alternative for patients who are unable to tolerate AC following major bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the rate of stroke prevention strategies instituted at time of discharge in patients with AF on AC who had been hospitalized for a bleeding event.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with AF on AC admitted for bleeding between January 2016 and August 2019. The type of AC, form of bleeding, and CHA(2)DS(2)VASc were collected. Stroke prevention strategies upon discharge and at 3 months were noted.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients with AF on AC were hospitalized with a bleeding event, of which 10.9% died. Among patients who survived, AC was restarted in 45.2% of patients, 9.7% were referred for LAAO, and 45.1% were discharged without stroke prevention strategy. At 3 months, 32.6% of patients still had no documented stroke prophylaxis. Those referred for LAAO had, on average, higher CHA(2)DS(2)VASc (5 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients with AF hospitalized for bleeding were discharged with no plan for stroke prophylaxis. Despite its safety and efficacy, LAAO appears to be an underutilized alternative in AF patients with high bleeding risk.
ePub ahead of print