Title

Is duration of symptoms predictive of acute myocardial infarction?

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date

2017

Publication Title

J Am Coll Cardiol

Abstract

Background: Patient interviews regarding the duration of symptoms are commonly conducted when evaluating a patient with possible acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and are believed to distinguish between AMI and non-AMI symptoms. Methods: In a single center, 569 patients that were evaluated in the emergency department (ED) for possible AMI from 5/2013 to 4/2015 were prospectively studied. Patients in the ED were asked by trained research personnel what was the longest duration of their predominant symptom. Diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated by 2 independent physicians in accordance with the universal defnition of AMI using all clinical information and required cTnI > 0.04 ng/ml (Siemens Ultra-cTnI). In situations where there was disagreement between the adjudicators, a third adjudicator reviewed the case for fnal determination of AMI. Patients with ECG fndings that led to immediate reperfusion were excluded. Results: There were 45 (8%) AMIs and 484 (85%) had chest pain as their predominant symptom. In those diagnosed with AMI, the mean duration of symptoms was 14.2 ± 33 hrs as compared to 17.9 ± 54.2 hrs in the 524 non-AMI patients (p=0.307). Looking at duration of symptoms in discrete time intervals also did not show a signifcant difference between AMI and non-AMI patients. Conclusions: Duration of symptoms did not help distinguish between AMI and non-AMI patients. Clinicians should focus on other elements of the history when evaluating patients with possible AMI.

Volume

69

Issue

11

First Page

247

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS