Evaluating approaches for constructing polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer in men of African and European ancestry
Darst BF, Shen J, Madduri RK, Rodriguez AA, Xiao Y, Sheng X, Saunders EJ, Dadaev T, Brook MN, Hoffmann TJ, Muir K, Wan P, Le Marchand L, Wilkens L, Wang Y, Schleutker J, MacInnis RJ, Cybulski C, Neal DE, Nordestgaard BG, Nielsen SF, Batra J, Clements JA, Cancer BioResource AP, Grönberg H, Pashayan N, Travis RC, Park JY, Albanes D, Weinstein S, Mucci LA, Hunter DJ, Penney KL, Tangen CM, Hamilton RJ, Parent M, Stanford JL, Koutros S, Wolk A, Sørensen KD, Blot WJ, Yeboah ED, Mensah JE, Lu YJ, Schaid DJ, Thibodeau SN, West CM, Maier C, Kibel AS, Cancel-Tassin G, Menegaux F, John EM, Grindedal EM, Khaw KT, Ingles SA, Vega A, Rosenstein BS, Teixeira MR, Kogevinas M, Cannon-Albright L, Huff C, Multigner L, Kaneva R, Leach RJ, Brenner H, Hsing AW, Kittles RA, Murphy AB, Logothetis CJ, Neuhausen SL, Isaacs WB, Nemesure B, Hennis AJ, Carpten J, Pandha H, De Ruyck K, Xu J, Razack A, Teo SH, Newcomb LF, Fowke JH, Neslund-Dudas C, Rybicki BA, Gamulin M, Usmani N, Claessens F, Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE, Townsend PA, Crawford DC, Petrovics G, Casey G, Roobol MJ, Hu JF, Berndt SI, Van Den Eeden SK, Easton DF, Chanock SJ, Cook MB, Wiklund F, Witte JS, Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Watya S, Gaziano JM, Justice AC, Conti DV, and Haiman CA. Evaluating approaches for constructing polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer in men of African and European ancestry. Am J Hum Genet 2023.
American journal of human genetics
Genome-wide polygenic risk scores (GW-PRSs) have been reported to have better predictive ability than PRSs based on genome-wide significance thresholds across numerous traits. We compared the predictive ability of several GW-PRS approaches to a recently developed PRS of 269 established prostate cancer-risk variants from multi-ancestry GWASs and fine-mapping studies (PRS(269)). GW-PRS models were trained with a large and diverse prostate cancer GWAS of 107,247 cases and 127,006 controls that we previously used to develop the multi-ancestry PRS(269). Resulting models were independently tested in 1,586 cases and 1,047 controls of African ancestry from the California Uganda Study and 8,046 cases and 191,825 controls of European ancestry from the UK Biobank and further validated in 13,643 cases and 210,214 controls of European ancestry and 6,353 cases and 53,362 controls of African ancestry from the Million Veteran Program. In the testing data, the best performing GW-PRS approach had AUCs of 0.656 (95% CI = 0.635-0.677) in African and 0.844 (95% CI = 0.840-0.848) in European ancestry men and corresponding prostate cancer ORs of 1.83 (95% CI = 1.67-2.00) and 2.19 (95% CI = 2.14-2.25), respectively, for each SD unit increase in the GW-PRS. Compared to the GW-PRS, in African and European ancestry men, the PRS(269) had larger or similar AUCs (AUC = 0.679, 95% CI = 0.659-0.700 and AUC = 0.845, 95% CI = 0.841-0.849, respectively) and comparable prostate cancer ORs (OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.87-2.26 and OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 2.16-2.26, respectively). Findings were similar in the validation studies. This investigation suggests that current GW-PRS approaches may not improve the ability to predict prostate cancer risk compared to the PRS(269) developed from multi-ancestry GWASs and fine-mapping.
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Male; Black People; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genome-Wide Association Study; Multifactorial Inheritance; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; White People
ePub ahead of print