Recommended Citation
Tinney F, Ivanics T, Stracke J, Malinzak L, Elsabbagh AM, McEvoy T, Nagai S, and Yoshida A. Robotic-assisted Versus Open Technique for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Comparison Using Propensity Score Matching for Intention to Treat. Transplant Direct 2022; 8(5):e1320.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2022
Publication Title
Transplant Direct
Abstract
Living donor robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is an alternative to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but experience with this technique is limited in the United States.
METHODS: A retrospective review of living donor kidney transplants performed between 2016 and 2018 compared RAKT with OKT with regard to recipient, donor, and perioperative parameters. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed on recipient/donor age, sex, body mass index, race, preoperative dialysis, and calculated panel reactive antibodies.
RESULTS: Outcomes of patient survival, graft survival, and postoperative complications were assessed for 139 transplants (47 RAKT and 92 OKT). Propensity score analysis (47:47) showed that RAKT recipients had longer warm ischemic times (49 versus 40 min; P < 0.001) and less blood loss (100 versus 150 mL; P = 0.005). Operative time and length of stay were similar between groups. Postoperative serum creatinine was similar during a 2-y follow-up. Post hoc analysis excluding 4 open conversions showed lower operative time with RAKT (297 versus 320 min; P = 0.04) and lower 30-d (4.7% versus 23.4%; P = 0.02) and 90-d (7% versus 27.7%; P = 0.01) Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RAKT is a safe alternative to OKT.
Medical Subject Headings
Transplant and Abdominal Surgery
PubMed ID
35434284
Volume
8
Issue
5
First Page
1320
Last Page
1320
