Trends and Outcomes of Antegrade Dissection and Re-Entry in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Recommended Citation
Rempakos A, Alexandrou M, Simsek B, Kostantinis S, Karacsonyi J, Mutlu D, Ybarra LF, Bagur R, Choi JW, Poommipanit P, Khatri JJ, Davies R, Benton S, Gorgulu S, Jaffer FA, Chandwaney R, Jaber W, Rinfret S, Nicholson W, Azzalini L, Kearney KE, Kerrigan JL, Haddad EV, Alaswad K, Basir MB, Krestyaninov O, Khelimskii D, Abi-Rafeh N, ElGuindy A, Goktekin O, Rangan BV, Mastrodemos OC, Al-Ogaili A, Allana SS, Sandoval Y, Burke MN, and Brilakis ES. Trends and Outcomes of Antegrade Dissection and Re-Entry in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-27-2023
Publication Title
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The contemporary frequency and outcomes of antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and outcomes of ADR use in a large multicenter CTO PCI registry.
METHODS: The characteristics and outcomes of ADR were examined among 12,568 patients who underwent 12,841 CTO PCIs at 46 U.S. and non-U.S. centers between 2012 and 2023.
RESULTS: ADR was used in 2,385 of the procedures (18.6%). ADR use declined from 37.9% in 2012 to 14.5% in 2022 (P < 0.001). Patients in whom ADR was used had a high prevalence of comorbidities. Compared with cases that did not use ADR, ADR cases had more complex angiographic characteristics, higher mean J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score (2.94 ± 1.11 vs 2.23 ± 1.26; P < 0.001), lower technical success (77.0% vs 89.3%; P < 0.001), and higher in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (3.7% vs 1.6%; P < 0.001). The use of the CrossBoss declined from 71% in 2012 to 1.4% in 2022 and was associated with higher technical success (87%) compared with wire-based techniques (73%). The Stingray device displayed higher technical success (86%) compared with subintimal tracking and re-entry (STAR) (74%) and limited antegrade subintimal tracking (78%); however, its use has been decreasing, with STAR becoming the most used re-entry technique in 2022 (44% STAR vs 38% Stingray).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of ADR has been decreasing. ADR was used in more complex lesions and was associated with lower technical success and higher major adverse cardiac events compared with non-ADR cases. There has been a decrease in Stingray use and an increase in the use of STAR for re-entry.
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Treatment Outcome; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Angiography; Dissection; Registries; Chronic Disease; Risk Factors
PubMed ID
37877912
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
Volume
16
Issue
22
First Page
2736
Last Page
2747
