Equipment entrapment/loss during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention
Recommended Citation
Alexandrou M, Rempakos A, Mutlu D, Al Ogaili A, Choi JW, Poommipanit P, Alaswad K, Basir MB, Davies R, Jaffer FA, Chandwaney RH, Azzalini L, Aygul N, Dattilo P, Jefferson BK, Gorgulu S, Khatri JJ, Krestyaninov O, Frizzell J, Elbarouni B, Rangan BV, Mastrodemos O, Burke MN, Sandoval Y, and Brilakis ES. Equipment entrapment/loss during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-23-2024
Publication Title
The Journal of invasive cardiology
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited data on equipment loss or entrapment during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: We analyzed the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes of equipment loss/entrapment at 43 US and non-US centers between 2017 and 2023.
RESULTS: Equipment loss/entrapment was reported in 40 (0.4%) of 10 719 cases during the study period. These included guidewire entrapment/fracture (n = 21), microcatheter entrapment/fracture (n = 11), stent loss (n = 8) and balloon entrapment/fracture/rupture (n = 5). The equipment loss/entrapment cases were more likely to have moderate to severe calcification, longer lesion length, higher J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO complications scores, and use of the retrograde approach compared with the remaining cases. Retrieval was attempted in 71.4% of the guidewire, 90.9% of the microcatheter, 100% of the stent loss, and 100% of the balloon cases, and was successful in 26.7%, 30.0%, 50%, and 40% of the cases, respectively. Procedures complicated by equipment loss/entrapment had higher procedure and fluoroscopy time, contrast volume and patient air kerma radiation dose, lower procedural (60.0% vs 85.6%, P less than .001) and technical (75.0% vs 86.8%, P = .05) success, and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (17.5% vs 1.8%, P less than .001), acute MI (7.5% vs 0.4%, P less than .001), emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (2.5% vs 0.1%, P = .03), perforation (20.0% vs 4.9%, P less than .001), and death (7.5% vs 0.4%, P less than .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Equipment loss is a rare complication of CTO PCI; it is more common in complex CTOs and is associated with lower technical success and higher MACE.
PubMed ID
38412445
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
