National Trends, Mortality and Outcomes in Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States
Recommended Citation
Krittanawong C, Ang SP, Qadeer YK, Wang Z, Alam M, Jneid H, and Sharma S. National Trends, Mortality and Outcomes in Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-13-2024
Publication Title
Crit Pathw Cardiol
Abstract
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have become increasingly utilized in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite these purported advantages, prior reports regarding the use of IVUS and OCT have indicated that contemporary use of intravascular imaging remains low with significant regional variation. Here, we present the findings of an updated contemporary analysis regarding the use of IVUS/OCT guided PCI vs. angiography-guided PCI in the United States. We also evaluated in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes between IVUS/OCT-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI-only over million patients in the United States. There has been a significant decrease in the number of PCIs performed, while there has been increasing in trend of IVUS/OCT-guided PCI over this period. Most importantly, we found that IVUS/OCT guided PCI were associated with better clinical outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, compare with angiography guided PCI.
PubMed ID
38768049
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
