Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Native Coronary Arteries Versus on Saphenous Venous Aorta Coronary Conduits in Patients With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Impella Device Implantation Achieved or Attempted (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial and the cVAD Registry)
Recommended Citation
Shavelle DM, Banerjee S, Maini B, Schreiber TL, Kapasi N, O'Neill WW, Popma J, Matthews RV. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on native coronary arteries versus on saphenous venous aorta coronary conduits in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction and impella device implantation achieved or attempted (from the protect ii randomized trial and the cvad registry). Am J Cardiol. 2018;122(6):966-972.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-15-2018
Publication Title
The American journal of cardiology
Abstract
Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a high-risk cohort given associated medical conditions and worse outcome of saphenous vein graft compared with native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The goal of the current analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in 591 patients with and without prior CABG and multivessel coronary artery disease or unprotected left main disease and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function underwent Impella supported PCI from the PROTECT II randomized trial and the cVAD Registry. Patients with prior CABG surgery (n = 201) were compared with those without prior CABG surgery (n = 390). The primary end point of this analysis was overall mortality at 30 days. Patients with prior CABG surgery had greater Society of Thoracic Surgery mortality score compared with patients without prior CABG surgery, 7.6 ± 6.4 versus 5.1 ± 5.5, respectively, p
PubMed ID
30057231
Volume
122
Issue
6
First Page
966
Last Page
972
