Use of a Liaison-Mediated Referral Strategy and Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Recommended Citation
Mansour AI, Seth M, Thompson MP, Casey M, Keteyian SJ, Smith FA, Gurm HS, and Sukul D. Use of a Liaison-Mediated Referral Strategy and Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2024; 17(10):e010874.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2024
Publication Title
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but remains underutilized. A liaison-mediated referral (LMR), where a health care professional explains CR's benefits, addresses barriers to participation, and places a referral before discharge, may promote CR use. Our objective was to assess the impact of an LMR on CR participation after PCI.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent PCI across 48 hospitals in Michigan between January 2021 and April 2022 and referred to CR before discharge. Clinical registry data were linked to administrative claims to identify the primary outcome, CR participation, defined as ≥1 CR session within 90 days of discharge. Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression was used to compare CR participation between patients with and without an LMR. For the secondary outcome, frailty proportional hazard modeling compared days elapsed between discharge and first CR session between liaison cohorts.
RESULTS: Among 9023 patients referred to CR after PCI, 4323 (47.9%) underwent an LMR (mean age, 69.3 [SD=11] years; 68.3% male) and 3390 (36.7%) attended ≥1 CR session within 90 days of discharge. The LMR cohort had a higher unadjusted CR participation rate (43.1% [95% CI, 41.5%-44.6%] versus 32.4% [95% CI, 31.1%-33.8%]; P<0.001), a higher adjusted odds ratio of attending ≥1 CR session (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.38), and a shorter delay in attending the first CR session compared with the non-LMR cohort (28 [interquartile range, 19-42] versus 33 [interquartile range, 21-47] days; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: An LMR was associated with higher odds of CR participation and may mitigate delays in CR enrollment. This referral strategy may improve CR participation and patient outcomes after PCI.
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Male; Referral and Consultation; Female; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors; Registries; Michigan; Coronary Artery Disease; Aged, 80 and over; Patient Discharge; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Recovery of Function; Risk Factors
PubMed ID
39364590
Volume
17
Issue
10
First Page
010874
Last Page
010874