MANTA vs Perclose for Large-Bore Femoral Closure in Impella-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Retrospective Outcomes Study

Authors

• Muhammad Memon, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Raef Fadel, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Herbert D. Aronow, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Ahmad Jabri, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Mohammad Alqarqaz, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Khaldoon Alaswad, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Asaad Nakhle, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Mir B. Basir, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Pedro Villablanca, Henry Ford HealthFollow

Recommended Citation

Memon M, Fadel R, Aronow HD, Jabri A, Alqarqaz M, Alaswad K, Nakhle A, Basir MB, Villablanca P. MANTA vs Perclose for Large-Bore Femoral Closure in Impella-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Retrospective Outcomes Study. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2025; 4(12):103943-103943.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2025

Publication Title

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv

Keywords

Impella; MANTA; Perclose; femoral access; high-risk PCI; large-bore; vascular closure device

PubMed ID

41497997

Volume

4

Issue

12

First Page

103943

Last Page

103943