Time-dependent risk reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: a MADIT-RIT sub-study
Recommended Citation
Stockburger M, Moss AJ, Olshansky B, Klein H, McNitt S, Schuger C, Daubert JP, Goldenberg I, Ruwald AC, Merkely B, Zareba W, Kutyifa V. Time-dependent risk reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: a MADIT-RIT sub-study. Europace. 2015;17(7):1085-91.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2015
Publication Title
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Abstract
AIMS: Data on the time-dependent benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) compared with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to reduce death or ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the time-related risk of death or sustained VT or VF in patients receiving CRT-D vs. ICD in the MADIT-RIT trial.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were utilized to compare the incidence and the risk of death or sustained VT/VF in the CRT-D and ICD subgroups by the elapsed time after device implantation (6 months). Of the ICD (n = 742) and CRT-D (n = 757) patients enrolled, the risk of death was lower in CRT-D vs. in ICD early after device implantation [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-1.03, P = 0.058] and beyond 6 months of follow-up (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21-0.73, P = 0.004), with the 6-month interaction P = 0.899. The overall risk of sustained VT/VF was reduced in CRT-D vs. ICD patients (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52-1.03, P = 0.07). However, the risk was similar in the first 6 months (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.62-1.62, P = 0.988), and a lower risk emerged 6 months after CRT-D implantation (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88, P = 0.011), with the 6-month interaction P = 0.059.
CONCLUSION: The reduced mortality risk of CRT-D compared with an ICD alone began early after device implantation and was sustained during long-term follow-up; the reduced risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias did not emerge until 6 months after device implantation.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00947310.
Medical Subject Headings
Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Defibrillators, Implantable; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Survival Analysis; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Treatment Outcome; United States; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed ID
25745075
Volume
17
Issue
7
First Page
1085
Last Page
1091