Comparative analysis of regional outcomes and adverse events after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: An IMACS analysis
Recommended Citation
Mirza KK, Xie R, Cowger J, Kirklin JK, Meyns B, Gustafsson F, Shaw SM, and Goldstein DJ. Comparative analysis of regional outcomes and adverse events after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: An IMACS analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39(9):904-914.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2020
Publication Title
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Regional outcomes after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been described. We examined differences in patient selection, survival, and adverse events across 3 geographic regions of the world: the Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe.
METHODS: Using data from The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support registry, all adult patients implanted with a continuous-flow LVADs were included in this International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support analysis (n = 15,560), of whom, 9,988 (64%) received axial-flow devices and 5,572 (36%) received centrifugal-flow devices.
RESULTS: There were significant interregional differences in the rate of implantation of patients aged >70 years (Americas: 14%, Asia-Pacific: 1%, Europe: 5%; p < 0.0001), morbidly obese (Americas: 5%, Asia-Pacific: 1%, Europe: 1%; p < 0.0001), male (Americas: 79%, Asia-Pacific: 77%, Europe: 85%; p < 0.0001), and implanted as destination therapy (Americas: 48%, Asia-Pacific: 4%, Europe: 22%; p < 0.0001). The rates of centrifugal pump usage varied by region (Americas: 30%, Asia-Pacific: 34%, Eu: 74%; p < 0.0001). Survival rates varied by region and the type of pump flow, with survival at 12 and 48 months (axial flow vs centrifugal flow) being 82% vs 82% and 52% vs 53 in Americas; 92% vs 86% and 83% vs 74% in Asia-Pacific; and 80% vs 75% and 69% vs 53% in Europe, respectively (regional survival p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: There are marked global differences in LVAD recipient characteristics, device utilization, and post-operative care. These heterogeneities along with differences in patient management and transplantation rates may impact long-term survival. Regional differences in adverse event incidence warrant further investigation.
PubMed ID
32487472
Volume
39
Issue
9
First Page
904
Last Page
914
