Delaying Reperfusion Plus LV Unloading Reduces Infarct Size: A Per-Protocol-Analysis of the STEMI_DTU Pilot Study
Recommended Citation
Pahuja M, O’Neill W, Karas RH, Moses J, Udelson J, Faraz H, Kapur NK. Delaying Reperfusion Plus LV Unloading Reduces Infarct Size: A Per-Protocol-Analysis of the STEMI_DTU Pilot Study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2023; 53:S19.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
8-1-2023
Publication Title
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Keywords
adult, balloon, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, clinical article, cohort analysis, conference abstract, controlled study, drug safety, feasibility study, female, human, infarct size, left ventricular assist device, male, microvasculature, multicenter study, obstruction, pilot study, prospective study, randomized controlled trial, reperfusion, risk assessment, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarct size (IS) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) are well-established prognostic markers in STEMI. The STEMI-DTU pilot trial was the first exploratory study to identify that LV unloading and delayed reperfusion was feasible. We now report new findings in patients from per-protocol cohort on the basis of magnitude of sum of precordial ST-segment elevation. Method: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and feasibility trial, 50 patients with anterior STEMI to LV unloading using Impella CP were assigned into two different arms including immediate reperfusion (U-IR) versus delayed reperfusion after 30 minutes of unloading (U-DR). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging assessed infarct size normalized to the area at risk (IS/AAR) 3-5 days after PCI. Patients without CMR at 3-5 days, without PCI of a culprit LAD lesion and without STEMI were not per-protocol and thus excluded from this analysis. Results: 32 patients meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria (U-IR,n=15; U-DR,n=17) were included in our analysis. Despite longer symptom-to-balloon times in the U-DR arm, IS/AAR was significantly lower with 30 minutes of delay to reperfusion in the presence of active LV unloading (47±16% vs 60±15%, p=0.02) and remained lower irrespective of the magnitude of precordial ΣSTE (Figure 1). MVO was not significantly different between groups (1.5±2.8% vs 3.5±4.8%,p=0.15), but significantly lower in the U-DR arm among patients with precordial ΣSTE>8mm (1.5±2.5% vs 5.6±5.3%, p=0.04). Conclusion: This analysis supports the paradigm-changing concept that when treated per protocol, 30 minutes of delay to reperfusion with active LV unloading may reduce infarct size irrespective of precordial STE magnitude. Ongoing STEMI-DTU Pivotal trial will provide us further information on these findings. [Formula presented]
Volume
53
First Page
S19
