Identifying significant environmental predictors of change in delay discounting among adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study
Recommended Citation
Kahn G, Bounoua N, Strickland JC, Hung IT, Maher B, Rabinowitz JA, Felton JW. Identifying significant environmental predictors of change in delay discounting among adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2026;34(5):553-563.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2026
Publication Title
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology
Keywords
Humans, Delay Discounting, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Cognition, Male, Adolescent, Child, Adolescent Development, Brain, Reward
Abstract
Delay discounting (a preference for smaller immediate rewards vs. larger delayed rewards; DD) is a transdiagnostic risk factor for health outcomes including substance use disorders, obesity, and others. Studies have identified numerous individual-level factors associated with DD in adolescents, however, research into how family, neighborhood, and larger environmental factors may impact DD have been limited by either examining very few environmental factors and/or using cross-sectional measures on DD. Identifying demographic and environmental predictors of both static levels of DD during adolescence and change in DD over time may expand our understanding of the etiology of DD and inform intervention targets. Using longitudinal data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (N = 7,858), we trained lasso models to perform variable selection on 325 factors hypothesized to be associated with development of DD. We separately evaluated predictors of baseline DD when children were 10-11 years of age and change in DD between baseline and 2-year follow-up. The lasso identified 33 predictors that explained 7% of the variance in baseline DD. Baseline DD explained 40% of the variance in change in DD and 52 predictors explained an additional 4%. These results were comparable to other studies that have taken a machine-learning approach the evaluating individual-level predictors in the ABCD. Although no single variable demonstrated large explanatory power, the overall set of environmental factors together appears to be as important as individual factors in the development of DD and underscores that DD likely develops as the result of many interacting factors with small individual effects.
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Delay Discounting; Female; Longitudinal Studies; Cognition; Male; Adolescent; Child; Adolescent Development; Brain; Reward
PubMed ID
42133374
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
Volume
34
Issue
5
First Page
553
Last Page
563
