Afamelanotide for Erythropoietic Protoporphyria
Recommended Citation
Janneke G. Langendonk, M.D., Ph.D., Manisha Balwani, M.D., Karl E. Anderson, M.D., Herbert L. Bonkovsky, M.D., Alexander V. Anstey, M.D., D. Montgomery Bissell, M.D., Joseph Bloomer, M.D., Chris Edwards, Ph.D., Norbert J. Neumann, M.D., Charles Parker, M.D., John D. Phillips, Ph.D., Henry W. Lim, M.D., Iltefat Hamzavi, M.D., Jean-Charles Deybach, M.D., Ph.D., Raili Kauppinen, M.D., Ph.D., Lesley E. Rhodes, M.D., Jorge Frank, M.D., Ph.D., Gillian M. Murphy, M.D., Francois P.J. Karstens, M.D., Eric J.G. Sijbrands, M.D., Ph.D., Felix W.M. de Rooij, Ph.D., Mark Lebwohl, M.D., Hetanshi Naik, M.S., Colin R. Goding, Ph.D., J.H. Paul Wilson, M.D., and Robert J. Desnick, Ph.D., M.D., et al. (2015) Afamelanotide for Erythropoietic Protoporphyria. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:48-59
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2-2015
Publication Title
The New England journal of medicine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythropoietic protoporphyria is a severe photodermatosis that is associated with acute phototoxicity. Patients with this condition have excruciating pain and a markedly reduced quality of life. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analogue, afamelanotide, to decrease pain and improve quality of life.
METHODS: We conducted two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of subcutaneous implants containing 16 mg of afamelanotide. Patients in the European Union (74 patients) and the United States (94 patients) were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a subcutaneous implant containing either afamelanotide or placebo every 60 days (a total of five implants in the European Union study and three in the U.S study). The type and duration of sun exposure, number and severity of phototoxic reactions, and adverse events were recorded over the respective 180-day and 270-day study periods. Quality of life was assessed with the use of validated questionnaires. A subgroup of U.S. patients underwent photoprovocation testing. The primary efficacy end point was the number of hours of direct exposure to sunlight without pain.
RESULTS: In the U.S. study, the duration of pain-free time after 6 months was longer in the afamelanotide group (median, 69.4 hours, vs. 40.8 hours in the placebo group; P=0.04). In the European Union study, the duration of pain-free time after 9 months was also longer in the afamelanotide group than in the placebo group (median, 6.0 hours vs. 0.8 hours; P=0.005), and the number of phototoxic reactions was lower in the the afamelanotide group (77 vs. 146, P=0.04). In both trials, quality of life improved with afamelanotide therapy. Adverse events were mostly mild; serious adverse events were not thought to be related to the study drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Afamelanotide had an acceptable side-effect and adverse-event profile and was associated with an increased duration of sun exposure without pain and improved quality of life in patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria. (Funded by Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01605136 and NCT00979745.).
Medical Subject Headings
Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Implants; Humans; Middle Aged; Pain; Protoporphyria, Erythropoietic; Sunlight; alpha-MSH
PubMed ID
26132941
Volume
373
Issue
1
First Page
48
Last Page
59
Comments
© 2015, Massachusetts Medical Society