Reliability of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index measurement tool for vitiligo
Recommended Citation
Pourang A, Kohli I, Ezekwe N, Parks-Miller A, Mohammad TF, Huggins RH, Lim HW, Deal LS, Lukic T, Zhang F, and Hamzavi I. Reliability of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index measurement tool for vitiligo. JAAD Int 2024; 16:206-213.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2024
Publication Title
JAAD Int
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A reliable instrument is needed to assess vitiligo severity and treatment response.
OBJECTIVE: To assess inter- and intrarater variability and accuracy of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index among trained raters and to evaluate a proposed Vitiligo Area Scoring Index using equidistant 10% depigmentation increments (VASI 10%).
METHODS: In this prospective study, 12 raters evaluated images of 10 participants with vitiligo on 2 occasions using total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) scores after training. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities and accuracy vs digital scores were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. VASI 10% scores were evaluated separately for interrater reliability and accuracy.
RESULTS: F-VASI interrater reliability improved from "moderate" to "good" between time points, while T-VASI was "good" at both time points. Intrarater reliability ranged from "good" to "excellent" for T-VASI and "poor" to "excellent" for F-VASI. Accuracy intraclass correlation coefficient was "good" to "excellent" for most raters. Interrater reliability using VASI 10% was "moderate" for both T-VASI and F-VASI.
LIMITATIONS: Small participant population and number of raters; participants were not assessed in person; no repeated VASI 10% measures.
CONCLUSION: Vitiligo Area Scoring Index generally provides good to excellent reliability for assessment of vitiligo by raters who receive standardized training.
PubMed ID
39040843
Volume
16
First Page
206
Last Page
213