441 Mpox in persons living with HIV: Results from an international dermatologic registry
Recommended Citation
Strahan AG, Lubov JE, Prasad S, Casas CG, Hruza G, Lim H, French LE, and Freeman E. 441 Mpox in persons living with HIV: Results from an international dermatologic registry. J Investig Dermatol 2023; 143(5):S76.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
5-2023
Publication Title
Journal Of Investigative Dermatology
Abstract
In 2022, mpox virus spread globally with 99% of cases in non-endemic countries. People living with HIV (PLHIV) are disproportionally affected, often with more severe clinical features and outcomes. The AAD/ILDS Dermatology COVID-19, Monkeypox (mpox), and Emerging Infections registry captured mpox cases from 13 non-endemic countries in a de-identified REDCap registry. We aimed to examine cutaneous symptomatology and outcomes in cases of mpox in PLHIV. Of 119 reported cases, 44 were PLHIV (35%). Cases were 98% male, with a median age of 38 years, located in Europe (57%) and the U.S. (39%). Nearly half of PLHIV reported skin lesions as their initial sign (45%), and 43 (98%) reported skin lesions during illness. The primary initial lesion locations were peri-anal (34%) and genito-inguinal (34%). Co-infection with other sexually transmissible infections (STI) was more common in PLHIV, 57% vs. 38% in all-registry cases (p<0.01). The most common co-infections were gonorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. Time to resolution was 17 days, 3 days shorter than all-registry cases, which may be due to higher use of Tecovirimat in PLHIV (36% vs. 25% in all-registry cases; p<0.01). There were no differences in the frequency of hospitalization or scarring. One death was reported. Overall, cutaneous lesion count was similar in PLHIV and all-registry cases. Lesion location was more frequently reported in the peri-anal and genito-inguinal regions. Sample size was insufficient to detect differences in length of infection, hospitalization, or scarring in PLHIV. Co-infections were more common in PLHIV, highlighting a need for co-testing for STIs during mpox evaluation.
Volume
143
Issue
5
First Page
S76