54214 Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children Aged 2–<12 Years by Previous Medication History: Subgroup Analysis From the Randomized, Phase 3 TRuE-AD3 Study
Recommended Citation
Dermer S, Considine C, Badal K, Stein-Gold L. 54214 Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children Aged 2–<12 Years by Previous Medication History: Subgroup Analysis From the>Randomized, Phase 3 TRuE-AD3 Study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 91(3):AB38.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
9-1-2024
Publication Title
J Am Acad Dermatol
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic inflammatory skin disease, typically develops in childhood and affects up to 23% of children globally. Ruxolitinib cream was effective and well tolerated in adults/adolescents and children (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2/TRuE-AD3; NCT03745638/NCT03745651/NCT04921969); findings were similar regardless of age. Here we report ruxolitinib cream efficacy by previous medication history in children from the phase 3 TRuE-AD3 study. Methods: Patients aged 2‒<12 years with AD ≥3 months, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2/3, and 3%‒20% affected body surface area (BSA) were randomized (2:2:1) to apply twice-daily ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was IGA treatment success ([IGA-TS]; score 0/1 with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 8. Results: 330 patients were randomized; median (range) age, 6 (2‒11) years; mean (SD) BSA, 10.5% (5.40%); 67.3% received AD therapy in the previous 12 months, including topical corticosteroids (TCS; 63.0%), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; 7.3%), and systemic therapies (2.4%). Prior therapies were mainly discontinued for reported lack of efficacy or to comply with study washout periods. IGA-TS at Week 8 was achieved by significantly more patients applying 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream (36.6%/56.5%) vs vehicle (10.8%; P≤0.0001). IGA-TS rates were higher for 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream vs vehicle for patients with prior AD therapy (40.7%/54.4% vs 10.9%; P<0.001/TCS [41.0%/54.9% vs 11.6%; P<0.001]/TCI [50.0%/45.5% vs 14.3%]/systemic therapies [50.0%/50.0% vs 0.0%]) or without prior AD therapy (29.2%/61.0% vs 10.5%; P<0.001, 1.5% ruxolitinib cream vs vehicle). Conclusions: Ruxolitinib cream demonstrated efficacy in children with AD, regardless of previous topical or systemic therapy.
Volume
91
Issue
3
First Page
AB38