53495 Disparity of cost and protective features between tinted and non-tinted sunscreens
Recommended Citation
Hamad J, Chung C, Lim HW, Matthews NH. 53495 Disparity of cost and protective features between tinted and non-tinted sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 91(3):AB183.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
9-1-2024
Publication Title
J Am Acad Dermatol
Abstract
Introduction: Ensuring optimal sun protection for skin of color (SOC) populations necessitates sunscreens with superior UVA protective factors and properties that guard against visible light and pigmentary disorders. Tinted sunscreens are often recommended for SOC patients. We sought to compare cost and characteristics of tinted versus non-tinted sunscreens on market. Methods: We collected and compared cost (USD), total ounces (oz), vehicle, Sun Protective Factor (SPF), water resistance (minutes), color matching, ratings volume, ratings scores, and comments between the best-selling non-tinted and tinted sunscreens from three of the largest online US retailers for skincare products: Amazon.com, Target.com, and Walmart.com. Results: We reviewed 120 products (60 tinted sunscreens). Mean cost-per-ounce for tinted sunscreens was $15.4/oz (SD 7.15), significantly higher than non-tinted sunscreens priced at $3.60/oz (SD 4.81) (95%CI: 9.57-14.0). Tinted sunscreens were generally available in smaller quantities, averaging 1.64oz/container (SD 0.64), as opposed to non-tinted options which averaged 6.17oz (SD 3.41, 95%CI: 3.64-5.42). Non-tinted sunscreens not only exhibited a higher average SPF (53.3; SD 16.4) in contrast to tinted versions (38.8; SD 11.6, 95%CI: 9.32-19.6), but also enjoyed higher customer ratings (4.57; SD 0.26 vs 4.12; SD 0.76) (95%CI 0.24-0.65). All p < 0.001. Conclusion Despite their higher cost, tinted sunscreens were found to have lower SPF values, diminished water resistance, and less favorable consumer ratings. These findings signal a pressing need for the dermatology community to address potential inequities in sun protection strategies for skin of color populations, urging a re-evaluation of the current market offerings to foster healthcare equality.
Volume
91
Issue
3
First Page
AB183