Patients maintain stable response with no or minimal fluctuations during 3 years of continuous treatment with lebrikizumab during long-term extension trial
Recommended Citation
Silverberg J, Stein Gold LF, Lio P, del Rosso J, Wollenberg A, Carrascosa J, Gallo G, Ding Y, Agell H, Diemert S, Vestergaard C. Patients maintain stable response with no or minimal fluctuations during 3 years of continuous treatment with lebrikizumab during long-term extension trial. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2026; 24:17.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
2-26-2026
Publication Title
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges
Keywords
Dermatology
Abstract
Background: Lebrikizumab (LEB), a high-affinity IL-13 inhibitor, demonstrated stability of response up to 2 years as monotherapy treatment in adults&adolescents (≥ 40 kg) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) from the pivotal phase 3 trials (ADvocate1, NCT04146363; ADvocate2, NCT04178967; ADjoin, NCT04392154). Methods: Here, we assessed the stability of response up to 3 years of LEB treatment in responder patients at Week (W) 16 after the induction with LEB Q2W, who were re-randomized to LEB Q2W or Q4W for 36W maintenance period in ADvocate1 and 2, and continued the same treatment (LEB Q2W, n = 82; LEB Q4W, n = 99) in ADjoin, the LEB long-term extension study up to 3 years. Response at W16 was defined as IGA 0/1 or EASI 75 without rescue medication in ADvocate1 and 2. Topical rescue medications were permitted during the analysis period (in W16-152). This analysis reported the proportion of LEB-treated patients who maintained EASI 75 (in W16 EASI 75 responders) and absolute EASI ≤ 7 response (in W16 EASI ≤ 7 responders), at individual level, in ≥ 80% of attended visits from W16-152. Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PNRS) was collected up to W104. Proportion of LEB-treated patients who achieved PNRS ≥ 3-point improvement among W16 EASI 75 responders, and maintained the PNRS response in ≥ 80% of attended visits from W16-104 was reported. Observed data was analyzed regardless of rescue medication use or discontinuation from treatment. Results: A stable EASI 75 response from W16-152 was reported in 92.9% of patients receiving LEB Q4W and 92.7% for LEB Q2W. A stable EASI ≤ 7 response from W16-152 was achieved for 96.8%, receiving LEB Q4W and 97.3% for LEB Q2W. In patients with baseline PNRS ≥ 3, achieving EASI 75 and PNRS ≥ 3-point improvement at W16, a stable PNRS ≥ 3-point improvement from W16-104 was achieved by 93.8% (N = 65) of patients receiving LEB Q4W and 88.7% (N = 62) for LEB Q2W. During ADjoin (W52-152) the use of low-moderate and high potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) was 9.1% (n = 9) in both TCS potency categories for LEB Q4W, whereas for LEB Q2W was 4.9% (n = 4) and 6.1% (n = 5), respectively. Conclusions: LEB provides long-term stability in skin response and itch relief with no or minimal fluctuations measured by EASI 75, EASI <7 and PNRS.
Volume
24
First Page
17
