N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in the Emergency Department: The ICON-RELOADED Study.

Authors

James L. Januzzi
Annabel A. Chen-Tournoux
Robert H. Christenson
Gheorghe Doros
Judd E. Hollander
Phillip D. Levy
John T. Nagurney
Richard M. Nowak, Henry Ford HealthFollow
Peter S. Pang
Darshita Patel
W F. PeacockFollow
Eoy J. Rivers
Elizabeth L. Walters
Hanna K. Gaggin

Recommended Citation

Januzzi JL, Jr., Chen-Tournoux AA, Christenson RH, Doros G, Hollander JE, Levy PD, Nagurney JT, Nowak RM, Pang PS, Patel D, Peacock WF, Rivers EJ, Walters EL, and Gaggin HK. N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency department: The ICON-RELOADED Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71(11):1191-1200.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-20-2018

Publication Title

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contemporary reconsideration of diagnostic N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) cutoffs for diagnosis of heart failure (HF) is needed.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP for acute HF in patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED) setting.

METHODS: Dyspneic patients presenting to 19 EDs in North America were enrolled and had blood drawn for subsequent NT-proBNP measurement. Primary endpoints were positive predictive values of age-stratified cutoffs (450, 900, and 1,800 pg/ml) for diagnosis of acute HF and negative predictive value of the rule-out cutoff to exclude acute HF. Secondary endpoints included sensitivity, specificity, and positive (+) and negative (-) likelihood ratios (LRs) for acute HF.

RESULTS: Of 1,461 subjects, 277 (19%) were adjudicated as having acute HF. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnosis of acute HF was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.93; p < 0.001). Sensitivity for age stratified cutoffs of 450, 900, and 1,800 pg/ml was 85.7%, 79.3%, and 75.9%, respectively; specificity was 93.9%, 84.0%, and 75.0%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 53.6%, 58.4%, and 62.0%, respectively. Overall LR+ across age-dependent cutoffs was 5.99 (95% CI: 5.05 to 6.93); individual LR+ for age-dependent cutoffs was 14.08, 4.95, and 3.03, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for the rule-out cutoff of 300 pg/ml were 93.9% and 98.0%, respectively; LR- was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS: In acutely dyspneic patients seen in the ED setting, age-stratified NT-proBNP cutpoints may aid in the diagnosis of acute HF. An NT-proBNP/ml strongly excludes the presence of acute HF.

PubMed ID

29544601

Volume

71

Issue

11

First Page

1191

Last Page

1200