North American Expert Consensus on the Post-procedural Care of Patients After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy Using a Delphi Process
Recommended Citation
Yang D, Mohammed A, Yadlapati R, Wang AY, Jeyalingam T, Draganov PV, Robalino Gonzaga E, Hasan MK, Schlachterman A, Xu MM, Saeed A, Aadam A, Sharaiha RZ, Law R, Wong Kee Song LM, Saumoy M, Pandolfino JE, Nishimura M, Kahaleh M, Hwang JH, Bechara R, Konda VJ, DeWitt JM, Kedia P, Kumta NA, Inayat I, Stavropoulos SN, Kumbhari V, Siddiqui UD, Jawaid S, Andrawes S, Khashab M, Triggs JR, Sharma N, Othman M, Sethi A, Baumann AJ, Priraka C, Dunst CM, Wagh MS, Al-Haddad M, Gayawali CP, Kantsevoy S, and Elmunzer BJ. NORTH AMERICAN EXPERT CONSENSUS ON THE POST-PROCEDURAL CARE OF PATIENTS AFTER PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY USING A DELPHI PROCESS. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-28-2024
Publication Title
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is significant variability in the immediate post-operative and long-term management of patients undergoing per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), largely stemming from the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to establish a consensus on several important questions on the after care of post-POEM patients through a modified Delphi process.
METHODS: A steering committee developed an initial questionnaire consisting of 5 domains (33 statements): post-POEM admission/discharge, indication for immediate post-POEM esophagram, peri-procedural medications and diet resumption, clinic follow-up recommendations, and post-POEM reflux surveillance and management. A total of 34 experts participated in the 2 rounds of the Delphi process, with quantitative and qualitative data analyzed for each round to achieve consensus.
RESULTS: A total of 23 statements achieved a high degree of consensus. Overall, the expert panel agreed on the following: (1) same-day discharge after POEM can be considered in select patients; (2) a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics may be as effective as a short course; (3) a modified diet can be advanced as tolerated; and (4) all patients should be followed in clinic and undergo objective testing for surveillance and management of reflux. Consensus could not be achieved on the indication of post-POEM esophagram to evaluate for leak.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this Delphi process established expert agreement on several important issues and provides practical guidance on key aspects in the care of patients following POEM.
PubMed ID
39214390
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
