Physician Perspectives on Hepatitis C Treatment During Pregnancy: A Multinational Multispecialty Survey
Recommended Citation
Kushner T, Buti M, El-Kassas M, Yilmaz Y, Takahashi H, Eguchi Y, Roberts SK, Chan WK, Yu ML, Ocama P, Khaderi S, Wungjiranirun M, Jacobson IM, Gordon SC, Nicolas A, Ward J, Gupta N, Hiebert-Suwondo L, Reynoso S, Henry L, Stepanova M, Papatheodoridis G, Younossi ZM. Physician Perspectives on Hepatitis C Treatment During Pregnancy: A Multinational Multispecialty Survey. Liver Int. 2026;46(5):e70619.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2026
Publication Title
Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver
Keywords
Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Antiviral Agents, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Hepatitis C, Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Attitude of Health Personnel, Male, Gynecology, Obstetrics, Gastroenterologists, Gastroenterology
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although pregnant people are a WHO priority population for hepatitis C (HCV) elimination, there is limited guidance on HCV treatment in pregnancy. Emerging data suggests direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is safe and effective. We performed a multinational survey among gastro-hepatologists (GI-Hep), infectious disease (ID) specialists, obstetricians-gynaecologists (ob-gyns), and general practitioners (GP) to evaluate current perspectives on HCV treatment in pregnancy.
METHODS: A 39-item survey was designed by experts at The Global Liver Council, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Coalition for Global Hepatitis Elimination and distributed electronically. Survey responses were compared across medical specialties and regions.
RESULTS: A total of 651 participants from all WHO regions representing 58 countries completed the survey: GI-Hep: 46%, GP-ID: 36%, ob-gyns: 18%. Only 25% would consider treating HCV during pregnancy, with significant differences by specialty. Main reasons for not considering DAAs in pregnancy were insufficient safety data (27%) and no clear guidelines for HCV treatment (32%). The highest acceptance of DAA use in pregnancy was in North America (45% vs. < 20% in other regions (p < 0.01)). Predictors of a greater willingness to treat HCV in pregnancy were having ≥ 10% of practice population with injection drug use (aOR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.49-3.60; p = 0.0002). GI-Hep specialty was associated with a lower willingness (aOR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.28-0.78; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite relatively high levels of HCV knowledge, few participants have experience with HCV treatment in pregnancy or would consider such treatment. Further availability of safety evidence and the inclusion of specific recommendations in guidelines could increase uptake of DAAs for pregnant individuals.
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Antiviral Agents; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Hepatitis C; Adult; Surveys and Questionnaires; Attitude of Health Personnel; Male; Gynecology; Obstetrics; Gastroenterologists; Gastroenterology
PubMed ID
41937493
Volume
46
Issue
5
First Page
70619
Last Page
70619
