Timing of Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Three Large Health Systems
Recommended Citation
Herron GC, DeCamillo D, Kong X, Haymart B, Kaatz S, Ellsworth S, Ali MA, Giuliano C, Froehlich JB, and Barnes GD. Timing of Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Three Large Health Systems. Thromb Haemost 2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-30-2024
Publication Title
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to better characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.
METHODS: We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI(2)) registry, a retrospective quality-improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 to 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration instructions for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).
RESULTS: Among a sample of 789 to 1,022 annual AF patients and 381 to 484 annual VTE patients prescribed a DOAC in the MAQI(2) registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period (2018-2022), there were 569 alerts for AF patients and 162 alerts for VTE patients. Alerts occurred more frequently during follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing in AF patients (78.2 vs. 21.8%), but more commonly at initial prescribing in VTE patients (59.9 vs. 40.1%). After initial review by quality-improvement abstractors, 19.3% of AF alerts and 14.8% of VTE alerts resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention about 75% of the time for both populations. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC, particularly for patients with AF, as off-label prescribing occurs frequently during the follow-up period.
PubMed ID
39009007
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
