Comparison of Low-Dose Gentamicin With Minocycline as Catheter Lock Solutions in the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bacteremia
Recommended Citation
Nori US, Manoharan A, Yee J, Besarab A. Comparison of Low-Dose Gentamicin With Minocycline as Catheter Lock Solutions in the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bacteremia. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006; 48(4):596-605.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2006
Publication Title
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Abstract
Background: Catheter-restricted antibiotic lock solutions were found to be effective in the prevention of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB), but insufficient data are available about the ideal agent and dose. We hypothesized that a low concentration of gentamicin would be as effective as the high doses studied in the past. Methods: In this prospective, open-labeled, randomized, clinical trial of patients on long-term hemodialysis therapy, patients were randomly assigned to administration of an antibiotic lock solution of gentamicin/citrate (4 mg/mL), minocycline/EDTA, or the control solution of heparin. Patients were followed up until the study end point of CRB was reached or a censoring event occurred. Interim data analysis was performed after 6 months to assess data safety; efficacy was noted and the study was terminated early. Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled into the study, evenly distributed in 3 arms, with data from 1 patient excluded from analysis. Seven of 20 patients in the heparin group (4.0 events/1,000 catheter days), 1 of 21 patients in the minocycline group (0.4 events/1,000 catheter days), and none of 20 patients in the gentamicin group developed bacteremia. Results were statistically significant by using 2-tailed Fisher exact test; heparin versus gentamicin, P = 0.008, and heparin versus minocycline, P = 0.020. Conclusion: Antibiotic lock solutions are superior to the standard heparin lock alone in the prevention of CRBs, and low-dose gentamicin solution has efficacy similar to that of greater concentrations used in previous studies. © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
PubMed ID
16997056
Volume
48
Issue
4
First Page
596
Last Page
605