Functional outcomes reporting using an adjusted outcomes index for mechanical thrombectomy in anterior cerebral artery occlusions – A case series
Recommended Citation
Fana M, Sanmugananthan P, Santangelo G, Kole M, Chebl AB, and Marin H. Functional outcomes reporting using an adjusted outcomes index for mechanical thrombectomy in anterior cerebral artery occlusions – A case series. Interdiscip Neurosurg 2025; 40.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-4-2025
Publication Title
Interdiscip Neurosurg
Abstract
Introduction: The decision to intervene with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) strokes is often made based on anticipated long-term functional outcomes using modified Rankin scores (mRS) which is primarily based on ambulatory status. Here, we review our single-center experience with ACA MT and evaluate the utility of various functional outcomes reporting.
Methods: A case series of 15 patients undergone MT for ACA stroke using the Solitaire or Trevo stent-retrievers was completed. The data retrieved included patient demographics, initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores and number of passes, post-procedure 24-hour NIHSS, intra-operative or post-operative complications, discharge NIHSS and mRS, and 90-day mRS.
Results: There were 87 % favorable ACA TICI scores (i.e. 2B/C and 3) and 80 % first pass recanalization rate. The Solitaire 4 mm stent-retriever was employed in the majority of cases (60 %). No procedural complications were noted in 73 % of cases and no hemorrhagic conversion in 87 % of cases. 90-day mRS scores of 0–2 were noted in 26 % of patients. Using an adjusted outcomes index, 80 % of patients had favorable outcomes based on the 24-hour baseline-adjusted NIHSS score decrease of ≥ 41 %.
Conclusion: Our preliminary findings here highlight successful radiographic and favorable functional outcomes using the Solitaire and Trevo stent-retrievers (3–6 mm luminal diameter) for ACA MT when reporting with the adjusted outcomes index as compared to the 90-day mRS score. Further studies comparing these outcomes reporting metrics with a larger sample size will be needed to further elucidate this notable difference.
Volume
40
