Longitudinal evaluation of tumor microenvironment in rat focal brainstem glioma using diffusion and perfusion MRI
Recommended Citation
Magdoom KN, Delgado F, Bohorquez AC, Brown AC, Carney PR, Rinaldi C, Mareci TH, Ewing JR, and Sarntinoranont M. Longitudinal evaluation of tumor microenvironment in rat focal brainstem glioma using diffusion and perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49(5):1322-1332.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2019
Publication Title
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brainstem gliomas are aggressive and difficult to treat. Growth of these tumors may be characterized with MRI methods.
PURPOSE: To visualize longitudinal changes in tumor volume, vascular leakiness, and tissue microstructure in an animal model of brainstem glioma.
STUDY TYPE: Prospective animal model.
ANIMAL MODEL: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 9) were imaged with 9L gliosarcoma cells infused into the pontine reticular formation of the brainstem. The MRI tumor microenvironment was studied at 3 and 10 days postimplantation of tumor cells.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI were performed at 4.7T using spin-echo multislice echo planar imaging and gradient echo multislice imaging, respectively.
ASSESSMENT: Tumor leakiness was assessed by the forward volumetric transfer constant, K
STATISTICAL TESTS: Changes in the assessed parameters within and across the groups (ie, rats 3 and 10 days post tumor cell implantation) were evaluated with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
RESULTS: Day 3 tumors were visible mainly on contrast-enhanced images, while day 10 tumors were visible in both contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted images. Mean K
DATA CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MRI was found to be more sensitive in detecting early-stage tumor boundaries than other contrasts. Areas of the tumor outlined by DCE-MRI and DTI were significantly different. Over the observed period of tumor growth, average vessel leakiness decreased with tumor progression.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1322-1332.
PubMed ID
30318760
Volume
49
Issue
5
First Page
1322
Last Page
1332