Recommended Citation
Lawrence RL, Ruder MC, Zauel R, Jalics A, Olszewski AM, Diefenbach BJ, Moutzouros V, Makhni EC, Muh S, and Bey MJ. In Vivo Static Retraction and Dynamic Elongation of Rotator Cuff Repair Tissue After Surgical Repair: A Preliminary Analysis at 3 Months. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10(3):23259671221084294.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2022
Publication Title
Orthop J Sports Med
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff repair is a common orthopedic procedure that provides pain relief for many patients, but unfortunately, an estimated 20% to 70% of repair procedures will fail. Previous research has shown that elongation (ie, retraction) of a repaired tendon is common even in patients with a repair construct that appears intact on magnetic resonance imaging. However, it is unknown how this repair tissue functions under dynamic conditions.
PURPOSE: To quantify static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation of repair tissue after rotator cuff repair.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Data from 9 patients were analyzed for this study. During surgery, a 3.1-mm tantalum bead was sutured to the supraspinatus tendon, medial to the repair site. Glenohumeral kinematics were assessed at 1 week (static) and 3 months (static and during scapular-plane abduction) after surgery using a biplanar videoradiographic system. The 3-dimensional position of the bead was calculated relative to the tendon’s insertion on the humerus (ie, bead-to-insertion distance). Static retraction was calculated as the change in the bead-to-insertion distance under static conditions between 1 week and 3 months after surgery, and maximum dynamic elongation was calculated as the maximal positive change in the bead-to-insertion distance during dynamic motion relative to the start of motion. The magnitudes of static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation were assessed with 1-sample t tests.
RESULTS: At 3 months after surgery, static retraction occurred in all patients by a mean of 10.0 ± 9.1 mm (P = .01 compared with no elongation). During scapular-plane abduction, maximum dynamic elongation averaged 1.4 ± 1.0 mm (P < .01 compared with no elongation). Descriptively, dynamic elongation consistently took 1 of 2 forms: an initial increase in the bead-to-insertion distance (mean, 2.0 ± 0.6 mm) before decreasing until the end of motion or an immediate and substantial decrease in the bead-to-insertion distance at the onset of motion.
CONCLUSION: Repair tissue elongation (static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation) appeared to be a common and significant finding at 3 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Dynamic elongation of repair tissue during scapular-plane abduction exhibited 1 of 2 distinct patterns, which may suggest different patterns of supraspinatus mechanical and neuromuscular function.
PubMed ID
35387360
Volume
10
Issue
3
First Page
23259671221084294
Last Page
23259671221084294
