The Conversion of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty with Non-CT Based Robotic Assistance: A Novel Surgical Technique and Case Series
Recommended Citation
Raja H, Wesemann L, Charters MA, and North WT. The Conversion of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty with Non-CT Based Robotic Assistance: A Novel Surgical Technique and Case Series. J Knee Surg 2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-24-2024
Publication Title
The journal of knee surgery
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted devices help provide precise component positioning in conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A few studies offer surgical techniques for CT-based robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA, however no studies to date detail this procedure utilizing a non-CT based robotic assisted device. This paper introduces a novel technique employing a non-CT based robotic assisted device (ROSA® Knee System, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) for converting UKA to TKA with a focus on its efficacy in gap balancing.
CASE: We present three patients (ages 46 to 66) who were evaluated for conversion of UKA to TKA for aseptic loosening, stress fracture, and progressive osteoarthritis. Each patient underwent robotic-assisted conversion to TKA. Postoperative assessments at 6 months revealed improved pain, function, and radiographic stability.
TECHNIQUE: Preoperative planning included biplanar long leg radiographs to determine the anatomic and mechanical axis of the leg. After arthrotomy with a standard medial parapatellar approach, infrared reflectors were pinned into the femur and tibia, followed by topographical mapping of the knee with the UKA in-situ. The intraoperative software was utilized to evaluate flexion and extension balancing and plan bony resections. Then, the robotic arm guided placement of the femoral and tibial guide pins and the UKA components were removed. After bony resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia, the intraoperative software was used to reassess the extension gap, and plan posterior condylar resection to have the flexion gap match the extension gap.
CONCLUSION: The use of a non-CT based robotic assisted device in conversion of UKA to TKA is a novel technique and a good option for surgeons familiar with robotic-assisted arthroplasty, resulting in excellent outcomes at 6 months.
PubMed ID
39317202
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
