Intestine Transplantation Across a Positive Crossmatch With Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies
Recommended Citation
Parekh R, Kazimi M, Skorupski S, Fagoaga O, Jafri S, and Segovia MC. Intestine transplantation across a positive crossmatch with preformed donor-specific antibodies. Transplant Proc 2016; 48(2):489-491.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2016
Publication Title
Transplantation proceedings
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We describe our experience using a modified protocol for immunosuppression for intestine transplantation across a positive crossmatch. Patients who underwent transplantation in 2013 were evaluated over a 12-month period for rejection and infectious events with comparison to procedure-matched controls on our standard protocol of immunosuppression.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a modified protocol for intestine and multivisceral transplantation for patients with a positive flow crossmatch. In addition to our standard protocol, patients with positive crossmatch were given rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preoperatively. DSA was sent for clinical evaluation at monthly intervals. Patients were screened for rejection by endoscopic evaluation.
RESULTS: Four patients underwent transplantation within a single year across a positive crossmatch. Two received isolated intestine transplants and 2 had multivisceral transplantation (MVT). During the 12-month follow-up, 1 patients had an episode of severe acute cellular rejection, which was managed with increased immunosuppression. None of the patients had episodes of cytomegalovirus infection. One patient developed major infection and 3 patients developed minor bacterial infections. Among procedure-matched controls with negative final crossmatch on standard management (no preoperative rituximab or IVIg), 2 developed mild acute cellular rejection and 2 developed minor infections. One developed cytomegalovirus viremia with invasion to the colonic mucosa.
CONCLUSIONS: We report our protocol for immunosuppression for IT and MVT across a positive crossmatch. This allowed transplantation despite the presence of a positive crossmatch, with low rejection rates but potentially increased risk for major infections compared to the negative crossmatch controls on our standard protocol.
Medical Subject Headings
Adult; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Graft Rejection; Histocompatibility Testing; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunosuppression; Intestines; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed ID
27109984
Volume
48
Issue
2
First Page
489
Last Page
491