Discharge Delays and Costs Associated With Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Recommended Citation
Boettcher SR, Kenney RM, Everson NA, Mulugeta SG, Shallal AB, Suleyman G, and Veve MP. Discharge Delays and Costs Associated With Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2026;13(1):770.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2026
Publication Title
Open Forum Infect Dis
Keywords
antimicrobial stewardship; drug costs; outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy; patient discharge; transitions of care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) coordination is challenging in multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO)-infected patients. The study purpose was to describe barriers and medication costs associated with OPAT utilizing therapies for MDRO.
METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort of hospitalized, MDRO-infected adults medically stable for discharge (MSDC) with an intended OPAT for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, eravacycline, meropenem/vaborbactam, or tigecycline from 1 January 2017 through 31 March 2025. Cohorts included patients who received an intended or modified OPAT regimen, defined as transition to alternative intravenous (IV)/oral therapy, in-hospital completion of IV therapy, or in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes included post-MSDC medication costs, length of stay (LOS), and oral-switch therapy opportunities.
RESULTS: One hundred-twenty patients were included; 29% received a modified OPAT regimen. β-lactams were the most intended OPAT regimen (67%). Patients with a modified OPAT regimen had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) medication costs ($4828 [$1209-$18 066] vs $1975 [$494-$4872], P < .001), more frequently experienced discharge delays ≥1 day (89% vs 66%, P = .011) and discharge referral disposition changes (40% vs 16%, P = .006), and had a prolonged median (IQR) LOS (20 [14-46] vs 13 [7-27] days, P = .023), compared to those who received an intended OPAT regimen. Oral-switch therapy opportunities were identified in 40% of patients. After adjusting for Medicaid, referral disposition changes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.21-9.89) and initial β-lactam therapy (aOR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55-10.79]) were associated with an increased odds of receiving a modified OPAT regimen.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified OPAT regimens are common and associated with increased costs, prolonged LOS, and discharge delays in MDRO-infected patients. These findings support the use of oral-switch therapy and improved care coordination.
PubMed ID
41488693
Volume
13
Issue
1
First Page
770
Last Page
770
