Challenges and Benefits to Adapting the C.L.E.A.R. Conversations Curriculum for Physician-Patient Communication to an Online Format: A Qualitative Interview Study
Recommended Citation
Cherabuddi MR, and Awdish RLA. Challenges and Benefits to Adapting the C.L.E.A.R. Conversations Curriculum for Physician-Patient Communication to an Online Format: A Qualitative Interview Study. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2025;12.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-1-2025
Publication Title
J Med Educ Curric Dev
Keywords
communication training; faculty development; graduate medical education; qualitative study; virtual learning
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Effective communication is essential for patient care and physician development. Connect, Listen, Empathize, Align, Respect (C.L.E.A.R.) Conversations, developed at Henry Ford Health in 2012, is an evidence-based program using experiential learning methods-role play, feedback, and reflection-to build communication skills. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the program transitioned from in-person to virtual delivery. Few U.S. studies have explored challenges and opportunities from the perspectives of facilitators, graduate medical education (GME) partners, and administrators.
OBJECTIVE: This exploratory qualitative study aimed to understand the experiences and perspectives of facilitators and administrators during the transition of C.L.E.A.R. Conversations to a virtual format. The purpose was to identify key opportunities, challenges, and strategies that supported this transition rather than to evaluate the benefits or compare virtual and in-person modalities, The study also sought to determine whether the adaptation process could inform a practical and scalable framework for other institutions, serving as both internal reflection and a foundation for hypothesis generation and future research in medical education.
METHODS: Structured interviews with facilitators, GME partners, and administrators were conducted from April to June 2024 and analyzed through inductive content analysis by two independent coders.
RESULTS: Eleven participants described the adaptation process, yielding five main themes: Modifying Content and Delivery, Adapting to Virtual Format, Challenges and Mitigations, Benefits and Surprises, and Recommendations and Insights.
CONCLUSION: Findings highlight how facilitator and administrator perspectives can inform the thoughtful adaptation of experiential learning programs to virtual environments, offering a replicable framework for scalable, learner-centered communication training in GME.
PubMed ID
41358264
Volume
12
First Page
23821205251404583
Last Page
23821205251404583
