Building and Validating a Computerized Algorithm for Surveillance of Ventilator-Associated Events
Recommended Citation
Mann T, Ellsworth J, Huda N, Neelakanta A, Chevalier T, Sims KL, Dhar S, Robinson ME, Kaye KS. Building and Validating a Computerized Algorithm for Surveillance of Ventilator-Associated Events. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;36(9):999-1003.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2015
Publication Title
Infection control and hospital epidemiology : the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an automated method for ventilator-associated condition (VAC) surveillance and to compare its accuracy and efficiency with manual VAC surveillance
SETTING: The intensive care units (ICUs) of 4 hospitals
METHODS: This study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center, a tertiary care center in metropolitan Detroit. A total of 128 ICU beds in 4 acute care hospitals were included during the study period from August to October 2013. The automated VAC algorithm was implemented and utilized for 1 month by all study hospitals. Simultaneous manual VAC surveillance was conducted by 2 infection preventionists and 1 infection control fellow who were blinded to each another's findings and to the automated VAC algorithm results. The VACs identified by the 2 surveillance processes were compared.
RESULTS: During the study period, 110 patients from all the included hospitals were mechanically ventilated and were evaluated for VAC for a total of 992 mechanical ventilation days. The automated VAC algorithm identified 39 VACs with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. In comparison, the combined efforts of the IPs and the infection control fellow detected 58.9% of VACs, with 59% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 91% PPV, and 92% NPV. Moreover, the automated VAC algorithm was extremely efficient, requiring only 1 minute to detect VACs over a 1-month period, compared to 60.7 minutes using manual surveillance.
CONCLUSIONS: The automated VAC algorithm is efficient and accurate and is ready to be used routinely for VAC surveillance. Furthermore, its implementation can optimize the sensitivity and specificity of VAC identification.
Medical Subject Headings
Algorithms; Humans; Inhalation; Intensive Care Units; Lung Diseases; Oxygen; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Population Surveillance; Positive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Pulmonary Edema; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult; Software Design; Software Validation
PubMed ID
26072660
Volume
36
Issue
9
First Page
999
Last Page
1003