Finding the Best Fit: A Head-To-Head Comparison of Triple Therapy Regimens in COPD
Recommended Citation
Versha F, Lohana A, Chander S, Patel V, Iribarren JB. Finding the Best Fit: A Head-To-Head Comparison of Triple Therapy Regimens in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025; 211:A4032.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
5-20-2025
Publication Title
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a significant global health challenge, particularly in its moderate to severe cases, where effective management is crucial to improving patient outcomes. The integration of inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in fixed-dose combinations has emerged as a cornerstone of therapy. This study evaluates the efficacy of two triple therapy regimens — Glycopyrrolate, Budesonide, and Formoterol Fumarate (GLY/BUD/FOR) and Fluticasone Furoate, Vilanterol, and Umeclidinium (FF/VI/UMEC) —in adults aged 45 and older with diagnosed COPD with FEV1/FVC < 70% to assess the impact of these regimens on the preventing COPD exacerbations and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX database. Patients with moderate to severe COPD and FEV1/FVC < 70% were identified based on ICD codes, and two cohorts were formed based on the prescribed inhaler therapy: GLY/BUD/FOR and FF/VI/UMEC. Patients with comorbid asthma, heart failure, or pneumonia were excluded. A 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance covariates such as age, gender, smoking status, and baseline lung function to minimize confounding and bias. Post-matching, both had 16,052 patients. Ultimately, 23,331 patients (FF/VI/UMEC: 11,234, GLY/BUD/FOR: 12,097) with a mean age of 67.4 ± 10.1 years and 55.3% males were included. Results:Among groups, 10.4% of patients on FF/VI/UMEC experienced COPD exacerbations compared to 6.7% on GLY/BUD/FOR (Risk Ratio: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.42-1.69, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a lower survival probability in the FF/VI/UMEC group (77.7% vs. 83.9%, p < 0.001). For acute respiratory failure, 3.5% of patients on FF/VI/UMEC experienced this outcome compared to 2.8% on GLY/BUD/FOR (Risk Ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12-1.45, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Our study suggests that FF/VI/UMEC demonstrated an increased risk of COPD exacerbations and acute hypoxic respiratory failure compared to the group receiving GLY/BUD/FOR. This indicates that GLY/BUD/FOR may provide enhanced protective benefits in patients with moderate to severe COPD, improving disease management and minimizing healthcare resource utilization. Further studies are warranted to explore the long-term benefits and potential mechanisms underlying the observed differences.
Volume
211
First Page
A4032
