Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-8-2016

Publication Title

Journal of applied clinical medical physics

Abstract

2.5 MV electronic portal imaging, available on Varian TrueBeam machines, was characterized using various phantoms in this study. Its low-contrast detectability, spatial resolution, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared with those of conventional 6 MV and kV planar imaging. Scatter effect in large patient body was simulated by adding solid water slabs along the beam path. The 2.5 MV imaging mode was also evaluated using clinically acquired images from 24 patients for the sites of brain, head and neck, lung, and abdomen. With respect to 6 MV, the 2.5 MV achieved higher contrast and preserved sharpness on bony structures with only half of the imaging dose. The quality of 2.5 MV imaging was comparable to that of kV imaging when the lateral separation of patient was greater than 38 cm, while the kV image quality degraded rapidly as patient separation increased. Based on the results of patient images, 2.5 MV imaging was better for cranial and extracranial SRS than the 6 MV imaging.

Medical Subject Headings

Brain Neoplasms; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Particle Accelerators; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiation Dosage; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

PubMed ID

27455505

Volume

17

Issue

4

First Page

268

Last Page

284

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.