The role of adjuvant therapy in stage IA serous and clear cell uterine cancer: A multi-institutional pooled analysis
Recommended Citation
Qu XM, Velker VM, Leung E, Kwon JS, Elshaikh MA, Kong I, Logie NA, Mendez LC, van der Putten LJ, Donovan EK, Munkarah AR, Wiebe EM, Parra-Herran C, Warner A, Louie AV, and D'Souza DP. The role of adjuvant therapy in stage IA serous and clear cell uterine cancer: A multi-institutional pooled analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2018; May;149(2):283-290.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2018
Publication Title
Gynecologic oncology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As the optimal adjuvant management of stage IA serous or clear cell endometrial cancer is controversial, a multi-institutional review was conducted with the objective of evaluating the appropriateness of various strategies including observation.
METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews for 414 consecutive patients who underwent hysterectomy for FIGO stage IA endometrial cancer with serous, clear cell or mixed histology between 2004 and 2015 were conducted in 6 North American centers. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank test, univariable and multivariable cox proportional hazard regression models.
RESULTS: Post-operative management included observation (50%), chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) (27%), RT only (16%) and chemotherapy only (7%). The 178 RT patients received external beam (EBRT, 16%), vaginal vault brachytherapy (VVB, 56%) or both (28%). Among patients without any adjuvant treatment, 5-year local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 82% (95% confidence interval: 74-88), 70% (62-78) and 90% (82-94), respectively. CSS in patients without adjuvant treatment was improved with adequate surgical staging (100% vs. 87% (77-92), log-rank p=0.022). Adjuvant VVB was associated with improved LC (5-year 96% (91-99) vs. 84% (76-89), log-rank p=0.007) and DFS (5-year 79% (66-88) vs. 71% (63-77), log-rank p=0.033). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better LC (5-year 96% (90-98) vs. 84% (77-89), log-rank p=0.014) and DFS (5-year 84% (74-91) vs. 69% (61-76), log-rank p=0.009). On multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy and VVB were associated with improved LC while adjuvant chemotherapy and age were significant for DFS.
CONCLUSIONS: In stage IA serous or clear cell uterine cancer, adjuvant RT and chemotherapy were associated with better LC and DFS. Observation may be appropriate in patients who have had adequate surgical staging.
Medical Subject Headings
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brachytherapy; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Proportional Hazards Models; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Retrospective Studies; Uterine Neoplasms
PubMed ID
29544706
Volume
149
Issue
2
First Page
283
Last Page
290