Does Stereotactic Online Adaptive MRgRT to the Prostate Preclude the Need for Rectal Spacer

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date

10-1-2023

Publication Title

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s): Historical prospective trials have shown that hydrogel rectal spacers can be very effective at decreasing rectal wall dose, and in turn rectal toxicity, in patients undergoing curative intent fractionated courses of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. However, in the modern era of stereotactic online adaptive MR guided radiation (MRgRT), it's not yet determined if rectal spacers improve the potential daily need for plan adaptation.

Materials/Methods: A prospective database of MRgRT patients were queried for intact prostate cancer patients who received stereotactic online adaptive MR guided radiation. Patients were reviewed for the presence of a hydrogel rectal spacer present on the planning images. The number of adaptive fractions as well as the organs at risk out of tolerance were noted for each patient. Comparisons between number of fractions adapted as well as the number of fractions adapted for rectal constraints, were noted. For each case within this patient group that required plan adaptation, pre-specified dose constraints were finally met prior to treatment delivery.

Results: A total of 27 patients were treated with stereotactic online adaptive MRgRT from 2020 to 2022. 8 patients had a hydrogel rectal spacer placed prior to treatment. Out of the 95 fractions delivered to non-hydrogel patients, 78 were adapted, with 52 for urethra, 31 for bladder, 5 for bladder neck, and 35 for rectum. Of the 40 fractions delivered to patients with a hydrogel spacer, 20 were adapted. The corresponding reasons for adaptation in this group were 14 times for the urethra, 19 times for the bladder, 8 times for the bladder neck, and 8 times for the rectum. It was common for multiple at-risk organs to require adaptation for a single fraction within both cohorts. Although the percentage of patients requiring adaptation for rectal constraints was greater in the non-hydrogel patients (36.8% vs. 20%), this was not found to be statistically significant; p value greater than 0.1.

Conclusion: The presence of a rectal spacer did not significantly reduce the need for online plan adaptation of the rectum for stereotactic online adaptive MRgRT. Furthermore, patients with a rectal spacer continued to often require adaptation to meet other prescription constraints. Further work is necessary to better select patients who would benefit from hydrogel spacers in the setting of online adaptive MRgRT. Additionally, longer follow-up of this patient population coupled with a larger patient cohort overall remains needed to increase the power of this analysis and to further explore the clinical outcomes of this patient group.

Volume

117

Issue

2

First Page

e370

Find It @ Sladen

Share

COinS