Randomized Prospective Trial of Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Chemotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Glioma After Second-line Chemotherapy
Recommended Citation
Modh A, Bergman D, Hanna R, Schultz L, Snyder J, Mikkelsen T, Movsas B, Ryu S, and Siddiqui MS. Randomized Prospective Trial of Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Chemotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Glioma After Second-line Chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103(5):E17-E18.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
2019
Publication Title
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Abstract
Background: Outcomes for patients with recurrent malignant glioma are dismal. Fractionated radiosurgery (FSRS) has been shown to be feasible and safe when delivered in this setting, but prospective evidence is lacking. Objectives: We conducted a single-institutional randomized trial on the use of FSRS versus chemotherapy for recurrent malignant glioma after second-line chemotherapy. Methods: High-grade glioma patients with tumor progression after two previous treatment regimens were enrolled. They were randomized to FSRS with bevacizumab or bevacizumab with irinotecan, temozolomide, or carboplatin (discretion of the treating provider). FSRS was delivered using a frameless linear-accelerator based intensity modulated technique with 32 Gy (8 Gy × 4 treatments within 2 weeks) prescribed to the gross target volume (gadolinium-enhancing lesion and DWI abnormality), and 24 Gy (6 Gy × 4) to the clinical target volume (FLAIR abnormality). The primary endpoints were local tumor control (LC) at 2 months and progression-free survival (PFS) in an intention to treat fashion. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0. Response to treatment was evaluated in a multi-disciplinary setting according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. The study planned to accrue 78 patients total, but was closed early due to slow accrual. Results: 34 patients were enrolled from February 2012 to December 2016. Twenty-seven patients had glioblastoma and 7 had anaplastic glioma at initial diagnosis. All patients had radiation therapy prior to enrollment and the median number of prior recurrences at time of enrollment was 3. Patients on the FSRS arm had an improved PFS (5.3 vs 1.8 months, p< 0.001) and improved LC at 2 months (2/16 patients progressing at 2 months compared to 11/15 on chemotherapy alone) (p=0.001). Eight patients on the chemotherapy alone arm received radiation treatment at the time of subsequent progression. The median survival was 6.4 months (7.1 months in the FSRS arm, 4.8 months in the chemotherapy arm, p=0.24). Four patients died within 2 months of study enrollment. The overall rate of grade 3 toxicity attributable to treatment and not disease progression was 29% and includes hematologic (n=2), intratumoral hemorrhage (n=2), new neurological deficit (n=2), headache (n=1), vomiting (n=1), cerebral edema (n=1), seizure (n=1). No treatment-related grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed. Conclusions: Findings of our study suggest that FSRS in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent malignant glioma is feasible and improves LC and PFS when compared to treatment with next line chemotherapy alone.
Volume
103
Issue
5
First Page
E17
Last Page
E18