Is Patient-Reported Baseline Fatigue Associated with Overall Survival among Patients with Resected Head of the Pancreas Adenocarcinoma on NRG Oncology/RTOG 0848?
Recommended Citation
Kachnic LA, Winter K, Abrams RA, Regine WF, Goodman KA, Lowy AM, Seaward SA, Wu AJ, Ramalingam A, Hatoum H, DiPetrillo TA, Geva R, Haddock MG, Wu JJ, Moughan J, Movsas B, Hong TS. Is Patient-Reported Baseline Fatigue Associated with Overall Survival among Patients with Resected Head of the Pancreas Adenocarcinoma on NRG Oncology/RTOG 0848?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 123(1S):S65.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
9-1-2025
Publication Title
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): The primary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) objective of NRG/RTOG 0848 was to determine if patient-reported baseline fatigue, as measured by the 13-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–F) version 4, correlates with overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with resected head of the pancreas adenocarcinoma (PA). Materials/Methods: NRG/RTOG 0848 was a 2-step randomized phase II & III study assessing the efficacy of adjuvant erlotinib (Step 1) and adjuvant concurrent fluoropyrimidine and 50.4 Gy radiation (CRT) following gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (Step 2). Eligibility included localized primary head invasive PA having gross total resection. Step 1 (Ph IIR) results showed no OS benefit with erlotinib. Step 2 (Ph IIIR) showed no OS differences with CRT; however, CRT improved overall disease-free survival (DFS) and both OS and DFS in node negative pts. For the HRQOL endpoint, 400 evaluable patients provided at least 90% power to detect a HR of 0.70 between low (> 30) and high (≤ 30) fatigue using a log-rank test with a 1-sided alpha=0.05. Distributions of pt/tumor characteristics were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test at alpha=0.05. Multivariable Cox regression models tested associations between baseline FACIT-F scores and OS after adjusting for Step 1 and Step 2 treatment, stratification factors (CA19-9 [ ≤ 90 vs. >90-180], nodal status [N0 vs. N+] and surgical margins [R0 vs. R1]), and other relevant factors. Results: NRG/RTOG 0848 opened accrual 11/2009 and closed 10/2018. Of 546 randomized patients, 522 were eligible with 436 (83.5%) consenting to HRQOL, 423 (97.0%) with baseline. Pts included in HRQOL were more likely to be white (84.4% vs. 70.9%, p=0.0028). Median (min-max) baseline FACIT-F score was 41 (6-52) with 71 (16.8%) pts having high baseline fatigue and 352 (83.2%) low baseline fatigue scores. Pts with high fatigue were more likely to be female (59.2% vs. 39.5%, p=0.0022) and have Zubrod=1 (73.2% vs. 53.7%, p=0.0024). Median (min-max) follow-up was 2.3 years (0.04-13.2). With 327 deaths (59 high and 268 low fatigue), baseline fatigue was not correlated with OS (1-sided p=0.21; HR=0.89 90%CI [0.71,1.13]). Due to only 17% pts with high baseline fatigue, an additional sensitivity analysis was done (based on Eek 2021 cut point of 43), resulting in 258 (61%) pts with high fatigue, with similar results (1-sided p=0.14; HR=0.88 90%CI [0.73,1.06]). For each cut point, after adjusting for treatment and stratification factors, baseline FACIT-F fatigue score remained not statistically significantly associated with OS. Conclusion: Patients who had low baseline fatigue on NRG/RTOG 0848, as measured by the FACIT-F tool, did not have significantly better OS than those with high baseline fatigue.
Volume
123
Issue
1S
First Page
S65
