Extending an Anatomy-Aware Framework for Unsupervised Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions
Recommended Citation
Zarei SP, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Hosseini R. Extending an Anatomy-Aware Framework for Unsupervised Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions. IEEE Access. 2026;14:24942-24953.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-6-2026
Publication Title
IEEE Access
Keywords
Lesions, Bayes methods, Brain modeling, Magnetic resonance imaging, Adaptation models, Image segmentation, Probabilistic logic, Computational modeling, Anatomy, White matter
Abstract
Traditional unsupervised lesion segmentation methods focus on modeling the healthy brain distribution, detecting lesions as deviations from it. However, relying exclusively on healthy feature learning often results in high false positive rates, particularly under domain shift. Although advanced foundation models and probabilistic approaches-incorporating semantic information or intensity priors-have improved performance on large, well-contrasted lesions such as tumors, their generalizability to more subtle and complex pathologies such as multiple sclerosis (MS) remains challenging. We propose a new framework that combines Bayesian modeling with deep learning to segment MS lesions without using manual annotation. The aim is to leverage the unsupervised modeling capability of the Bayesian framework, which adaptively refines a deep learning-generated lesion map using anatomical priors and MRI observations. The method explicitly models healthy brain anatomy using tissue probabilities and detects lesions as hyperintense outliers within white matter regions, which is consistent with clinical reasoning. Evaluated on the ISBI dataset, our approach outperforms baseline unsupervised methods, with a Dice score of 0.52, an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.51, an intersection-over-union (IoU) of 0.36, a sensitivity of 0.52, and a specificity of 0.99. By integrating anatomical priors with statistical intensity modeling within a Bayesian framework, our approach reduces false positives, which are common in previous methods, mainly due to boundary ambiguity and intensity overlap between lesions and gray matter.
Volume
14
First Page
24942
Last Page
24953
