Discrepancies Between Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Sleep: Potential Marker for Mild Cognitive Impairment
Recommended Citation
Gumenyuk V, Murman DL, Roth T, Korzyukov O, Miller NR, Parker SM, and Rizzo M. Discrepancies Between Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Sleep: Potential Marker for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sleep Med Res 2025; 16(1):33-41.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-9-2025
Publication Title
Sleep Med Res
Abstract
Background and Objective: Discrepancies between objective and subjective evaluations of sleep efficiency have been observed in individuals with pathological and healthy aging. Objective sleep evaluation using actigraphy has been proposed as a potential tool for the clinical assessment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Methods: Habitual sleep at home was evaluated using actigraphy (objective measure) and sleep diaries (subjective measure) in 45 participants (between 28 and 72 years old). Participants were divided into four groups by age and by diagnosis (MCI and Alzheimer desease). Cognitive and sleep measures were analyzed for comparisons and correlations.
Results: Significant discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep efficiency were observed in healthy and pathological ages. The MCI group showed the lowest sleep efficiency compared to other groups. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between cognitive impairments and sleep efficiency in MCI and AD groups.
Conclusions: Objective sleep evaluation, with a particular focus on sleep efficiency, should be considered as a potential marker for MCI.
Medical Subject Headings
Sleep efficiency; Healthy and pathological ageing; Alzheimer disease; Mild cognitive impairment
PubMed ID
Not assigned.
Volume
16
Issue
1
First Page
33
Last Page
41
