Survival benefit of living donor availability in a large North American Center. An intention-to-treat analysis

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date

5-16-2024

Publication Title

HPB (Oxford)

Abstract

Background: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers superior survival than staying on the waiting list, even at low MELD-Na of 11. We sought to evaluate the benefits of LDLT through an intention-to-treat-analysis from the time of listing. Methods: Liver transplant candidates listed at the University Health Network (2000-2021) were categorized as pLDLT (with a potential live donor who had undergone health screening) or pDDLT (without an identified live donor). Employing Cox proportional-hazard regression, we evaluated pLDLT’s survival impact through a risk-adjusted analysis (age, sex, MELD-Na at listing, primary etiology, presence of HCC). Furthermore, we assessed pLDLT’s effect across the spectrum of MELD-Na. Results: Of 4,553 candidates, 1,504 (33%) had potential living donors. Median age was 57 years, 68% were male and median MELD-Na was 15. Common etiologies included hepatitis C (29.5%) and alcoholic liver disease (29.1%), with 35.8% having HCC. The pDDLT group had a higher waitlist dropout (45%vs.21%, P<0.001) and waitlist mortality (19%vs.10%, P<0.001) overall, while the pLDLT group experienced a shorter median waiting time (4.8vs.6.2 months, P=0.003). The pLDLT group demonstrated superior survival outcomes at 1- (88.7%vs.82.4%), 5- (75.4%vs.64.4%), and 10-year (66.5%vs.54.5%) from listing (log-rank P<0.001)(Figure 1A) with a 36% reduced risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.57-0.72, P<0.001). Moreover, predicted hazard ratios consistently remained below 1 across the MELD-Na range 12-39 (Figure 1B). Conclusion: Potential living donors enhance survival for end-stage liver disease patients with MELD-Na as low as 12, emphasizing LDLT's significance for those awaiting liver transplants. [Formula presented]

Volume

26

First Page

S65-S66

Share

COinS