Regenerative Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction: A Survey on Current Global Practice Trends and GAF Expert Recommendations
Recommended Citation
Al Hashimi M, Pinggera GM, Mostafa T, Rambhatla A, Hamoda T, Shah R, Chung E, Harraz A, Arafa M, Toprak T, Raheem O, Giulioni C, Birowo P, Boeri L, Jassim Y, Kothari P, Vishwakarma R, Sahin B, Atmoko W, Gamidov S, Rojas-Cruz C, Katz D, Fregonesi A, Gherabi N, Zini A, Ho CCK, Al-Marhoon MS, Martinez M, Russo GI, Rashed A, Busetto GM, Ko E, Park HJ, Cayan S, Saleh R, Rajmil O, Kim DS, Colpi G, Smith R, Ragab M, Kadioglu A, Nguyen Q, Bocu K, El-Sakka A, Thomas C, Alnajjar HM, Alipour H, and Agarwal A. Regenerative Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction: A Survey on Current Global Practice Trends and GAF Expert Recommendations. World J Mens Health 2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-12-2024
Publication Title
World J Mens Health
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method.
RESULTS: Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT's future use, despite pending guidelines support.
CONCLUSIONS: This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.
PubMed ID
39028131
ePublication
ePub ahead of print
