Intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal approaches to W configuration neobladders after robot-assisted radical cystectomy
Recommended Citation
Aly AAH, Ahmed Y, Kozlowski J, May P, Nyquist J, Sexton S, Curtin L, Peabody JO, AboulEnein H, and Guru KA. Intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal approaches to W configuration neobladders after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2017; 11(9):S316.
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
2017
Publication Title
Can Urol Assoc J
Abstract
Introduction: We sought to compare robot-assisted intracorporeal (IC) to W orthotopic ileal neobladder to extracorporeal (EC) approach. Methods: A retrospective review of our robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) database was performed. No conversion to open surgery was done. We identified patients who underwent IC and EC neobladders (W configuration) and compared their short-term perioperative outcomes. Results: 39 patients received neobladders (33 EC and six IC). Both groups showed comparable preoperative characteristics except for body mass index (BMI) (IC group showed higher BMI: 33 vs. 28; p=0.03). Although there was no significant difference in the diversion time, IC patients exhibited shorter overall operative time (374 vs. 446 minutes; p=0.04). They experienced less blood loss (183 vs. 426 ml; p=0.02). They had shorter hospital stay (5 vs. 9 days; p=0.001) but longer ICU stay (3 vs. 1 day; p=0.009). Fewer patients experienced overall complications (50% vs. 90%; p<0.001) but similar high-grade complications. Conclusions: Patients with IC neobladders showed better short-term perioperative outcomes when compared to EC approach.
Volume
11
Issue
9
First Page
S316