Clinical Experience of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-In-Ring Interventions With Incomplete Rings: Transjugular and Transfemoral Approaches

Authors

• Leo Kar Lok Lai, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Jonathan X. Fang, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Hussayn Alrayes, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Georgi Fram, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Ahmad Jabri, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• John Dawdy, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Kevin Lai, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• James Alter, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• James C. Lee, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Bryan Zweig, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Brian P. O’Neill, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Tiberio M. Frisoli, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Pedro Engel Gonzalez, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• William W. O'Neill, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Pedro A. Villablanca, Henry Ford HealthFollow

Recommended Citation

Lai LKL, Fang JX, Alrayes H, Fram G, Jabri A, Dawdy J, Lai K, Alter J, Lee JC, Zweig B, O’Neill BP, Frisoli TM, Gonzalez PE, O’Neill WW, Villablanca PA. Clinical Experience of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-In-Ring Interventions With Incomplete Rings: Transjugular and Transfemoral Approaches. Struct Heart. 2026;10(8):101048.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

8-1-2026

Publication Title

Struct Heart

Abstract

•Tricuspid valve-in-ring using balloon-expandable valves appeared feasible via both transjugular and transfemoral approaches in this small single-center series.•Procedural success was higher with the transjugular approach (86%) than the transfemoral approach (60%).•No access-site complications occurred with transjugular access, whereas 1 groin complication (20%) occurred transfemorally.•Paravalvular leak rates were lower with transjugular (29%) versus transfemoral access (60%).•Paravalvular leak was most frequent with rigid Contour 3D and semirigid Carpentier-Edwards rings, and lowest with MC3 and CG Future bands.

PubMed ID

42369875

Volume

10

Issue

8

First Page

101048

Last Page

101048