Laminectomy Width and Postoperative C5 Palsy After Posterior Cervical Decompression Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis: A Comparative Cohort Study

Authors

• Jeffrey Turnbull, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Ammar H. Alsalahi, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Daniel W. Griepp, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• James W. Dragonette, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Andrew H. Beggs, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Bryce Sarcar, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Doris Tong, Henry Ford Health
• Teck-Mun Soo, Henry Ford Health
• Clifford M. Houseman, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Prashant S. Kelkar, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Peter Bono, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Heather Heitkotter, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Daniel A. Carr, Henry Ford HealthFollow
• Boyd F. Richards, Henry Ford HealthFollow

Recommended Citation

Turnbull JP, Alsalahi A, Griepp DW, Dragonette J, Beggs A, Sarcar B, Tong D, Soo TM, Houseman CM, Kelkar PS, Bono P, Heitkotter H, Carr DA, Richards BF. Laminectomy Width and Postoperative C5 Palsy After Posterior Cervical Decompression Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis: A Comparative Cohort Study. Int J Spine Surg. 2026;20(4):598-606.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-11-2026

Publication Title

Int J Spine Surg

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting which patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) will develop C5 palsy remains a significant challenge. We sought to determine whether a specific cervical laminectomy width in PCDF is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative C5 palsy.

METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent PCDF from 2016 to 2021. Our primary outcome was the presence of C5 palsy, defined as loss of at least 1 manual muscle test grade of the deltoid and/or biceps on hospital discharge from baseline. Laminectomy width was measured on postoperative cervical computed tomography images, and groups were stratified based on decompressions < 18 mm, 18 to 22 mm, and >22 mm. Preoperative C3 to C5 cord signal change, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, C4 to C5 neuroforaminal stenosis, and the C2 to C7 Cobb angles were also assessed.

RESULTS: Of the 111 patients included, 46 patients (41%) achieved laminectomy width < 18 mm, 20 patients (18%) a width of 18 to 22 mm, and 45 patients (41%) a width of >22 mm. Eighteen patients (16.2%) developed C5 palsy. Multivariable analysis showed that a cervical laminectomy width >22 mm was significantly associated with increased odds of C5 palsy (OR = 13.1, 95% CI [2.43-70.41],

CONCLUSIONS: Narrow laminectomy (< 22 mm) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of C5 palsy compared with wider laminectomy (>22 mm). Preoperative C3 to C5 cord signal change, C4 to C5 foraminal stenosis, and greater C2 to C7 Cobb angles were also independently linked to significantly increased odds of developing postoperative C5 palsy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Developing C5 palsy is a significant cause of morbidity in patients undergoing PCDF. Performing a narrow laminectomy may help mitigate this risk and reduce patient morbidity.

PubMed ID

42020193

ePublication

ePub ahead of print

Volume

20

Issue

4

First Page

598

Last Page

606